Function names and lambdas

Fri Apr 7 02:08:47 PDT 2017

On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 18:45 +0000, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 18:37:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > I am used to a function name being a reference to the function 
> > body, cf. lots of other languages. However D rejects:
> > 
> > 	iterative
> 
> Try
> 
> &iterative
> 
> 
> 
> The compiler would probably optimize out a trivial thing anyway, 
> but &foo should work too in most cases.

No don't I look like a real idiot. Of course I should have known that.
:-)

It works exactly as required.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20170407/c26228f2/attachment.sig>