D outperformed by C++, what am I doing wrong?

[amfvcg via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 13 August 2017 at 08:33:53 UTC, Petar Kirov 
[ZombineDev] wrote:
>
> With Daniel's latest version (
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.5963.1502612885.31550.digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com )
>
> $ ldc2 -O3 --release sum_subranges2.d
> $ ./sum_subranges2
> 210 ms, 838 μs, and 8 hnsecs
> 50000000

Great!!! And that's what I was hoping for.

So the conclusion is:

use the latest ldc that's out there.

Thank you Petar, thank you Daniel. (I cannot change the subject 
to SOLVED, can I?)

Btw. the idiomatic version of this d sample looks how I imagined 
it should!