Is Nullable supposed to provide Optional semantics?

[vit]

On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 20:52:51 UTC, Chris Paulson-Ellis 
wrote:
> I've been bitten by trying to use Nullable(T) on class types. 
> Minimal example...
>
> [...]

use:
    n = Nullable!Object.init;   //doesn't call destroy

instead of:
    n.nullify();