Idiomatic way of writing nested loops?
Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com
Mon Jul 17 05:31:39 PDT 2017
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 11:55:47 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
> Thank you! I knew it is in the library! So, `parallel` will
> work just fine with this function, isn't it?
Yes
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list