Mixin in Inline Assembly

[Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 12:00:45 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
>  So why is the offset off by 14h (20 bytes)? It's not like we 
> need a to set a ptr first.
>
>  Go figure i probably found a bug...

  Well as a side note a simple yet not happy workaround is making 
a new array slice of the memory and then using that pointer 
directly. Looking at the intel opcode and memory call 
conventions, I could have used a very compact intel set and 
scaling. Instead I'm forced to ignore scaling, and I'm also 
forced to push/pop the flags to save the carry when advancing the 
two pointers in parallel. Plus there's 3 instructions that don't 
need to be there.

  Yeah this is probably nitpicking... I can't help wanting to be 
as optimized and small as possible.