As many thanks As possible to who crates D and UFCS feature

[Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 08:23:55 UTC, k-five wrote:
> On Friday, 12 May 2017 at 20:53:56 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
>
>> Is it safe to say that these 40 lines of D do the same as your 
>> 324 lines of C++ [1]?
>
> No. I cannot say that.
> Since this is not a full port of renrem in C++ to D. It was 
> just an example in D, nothing else.

OK understood.

>> This, and your comments on the difficulties of building renrem 
>> [2] versus doing "rdmd", and the steepness of the learning 
>> curve (1 year C++ vs 2 weeks D), and the productivity (2 hours 
>> D vs ?? C++)
>
> I am not sure about understanding your purpose correctly.
>
>> I think are plenty material for a nice little blog.
>
> Which English Grammar rule is used here? Sorry but I do not 
> know!
> are: linking verb after
> think: main verb and subject!

I am sorry for expressing myself poorly. What I meant to say is 
that it looked like you can write an interesting article about 
your experience learning and using C++ and learning and using D, 
comparing the two. D could come out of that comparison favourably 
considering 1) how long it takes to learn, 2) how much code you 
need to write, 3) whether there are difficulties along the way, 
and 4) how productive you can be (getting things done). I may 
have been jumping to conclusions, but it could still be an 
interesting read, especially for people that consider learning 
C++ or D. In particular the focus on UFCS is interesting, as that 
can be rather alien to beginners, and something you are 
enthusiastic about.

> I just want to say D is easy to learn and use; that is it. I 
> have no arguing about which Language is better no not. Of 
> course that program with C++, took me 1 month until it got 
> ready, but in 2 days I could ported to D, since I had the 
> already experience of implementing it.

Understood.

>> Mike Parker runs the D blog, and I think he might be 
>> interested. No need to worry about the english language, you 
>> are safe with Mike. I'll see if I can get you his attention.
>
> Sorry ... Still could not understand ... except you may want me 
> to put such post in D blog not here, and in this case, your are 
> right, the best way for such examples is on a blog or similar. 
> Sorry for posting it here.

Posting it here is fine. You could also have posted in the 
general forum, as it is more of a compliment than a question. But 
if you want to write more about your positive experience, then a 
blog article might be nice. It would reach more people, and it 
would maybe help some of them. If you want to do that work, then 
maybe Mike Parker would want to put it on the D blog, and help 
you polish it.

Whatever you decide to do, thanks for sharing your experience 
here :-)

Bastiaan.