function overload with mixin template bug?

[Patric Dexheimer via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Wednesday, 17 May 2017 at 13:26:36 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 May 2017 at 13:13:06 UTC, Patric Dexheimer 
> wrote:
>> Function overloads coming from mixin templates are not being 
>> detected ?
>
> A name being present in the struct means that name is NOT 
> pulled from the mixin template. This is a feature, not a bug. 
> It allows overriding of mixin template individual behavior. 
> see: http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/sep-27.html
>
>
> To bring in the mixin overloads in addition to your current 
> ones instead of overriding, use alias:
>
> mixin Foo some_name;
> alias foo = some_name.foo;
> void foo() {} // now they are all combined

Oh, thank you, didn´t know about it.
didn´t know about this syntax also "mixin Foo some_name;"