Distinct "static" parent property contents for children
Timoses
timosesu at gmail.com
Thu Nov 9 11:07:57 UTC 2017
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 17:46:42 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 17:38:27 UTC, Timoses wrote:
>> Are there better options/ways of achieving this?
>
> What are you actually trying to achieve? What are you using
> these variables for?
Well, I have the following outline:
class File
{
Section[] sections;
}
abstract class Section
{
enum Part { Header, Content, Footer};
SectionEntry[Part] entries;
}
class SectionEntry
{
bool isComment;
string[] lines;
}
And then I'd like to have somthing like predefined sections, e.g.:
class SectionTypeA : Section
{
.... // provide "static" information that is
// always the same for this type of seciton
// however, the Content part may vary
}
Are there more elegant ways of achieving this?
> My first thought is you should abandon the variable approach
> and just use an abstract function that returns the value for
> each child via overriding. It won't be static, but it also
> won't take any per-instance memory.
Sounds like a good approach. I'll try this out for sure.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list