How you guys go about -BetterC Multithreading?
Petar
Petar
Fri Nov 10 13:20:07 UTC 2017
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 11:55:57 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 16:00:36 UTC, Petar Kirov
> [ZombineDev] wrote:
>>
>> In short, the cost / benefit of going all the way
>> version(D_BetterC) is incredibly poor for regular
>> applications, as you end up a bit more limited than with
>> modern C++ (> 11) for prototyping. For example, even writers
>> of D real-time audio plugins don't go as far.
>
> For now we do have some @nogc alternatives for mutex, condition
> variables, thread-pool, file reading, etc... (dplug:core
> package) for use with the runtime disabled - the middle ground
> that's way more usable than -betterC. They may, or not, be
> applicable to -betterC.
Interesting, thanks for the info. It looks you made good progress
since the last time I read about your project (quite a while
ago). I'll be sure to check what you have in dplug:core ;)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list