Is it possible to specify the address returned by the address of operator?

[DreadKyller]

On Wednesday, 27 September 2017 at 21:01:36 UTC, Jesse Phillips 
wrote:
> For example, if you store your Matrix in a custom container it 
> could try to store pointer rather than the struct itself, if & 
> is overloaded the generic implementation would be broken 
> because it would no longer be a pointer to Matrix but to the 
> inner element.
>
> Whereas generic code which utilizes addition or append can 
> assume the type appropriately defined the behavior to 
> semantically match the desired use, generic code would be 
> broken if the type changed & to do something different from 
> what the language defines it to do.

Alright, that makes sense, that's some valid reasoning, I can 
accept that.