@property for simple methods?

[Vladimirs Nordholm]

On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 15:05:04 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 14:51:57 UTC, Vladimirs Nordholm 
> wrote:
>> On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 14:20:49 UTC, Dennis wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Ah! First time I read the docs I didn't understand the 
>> typeof(exp) explanation, but yours made me understand that 
>> part.
>>
>> Do you think I should I omit the @property tag, if the only 
>> wanted behaviour is to set a value (`foo.bar = "baz";`) ?
>
> Yes I would omit @proporty if you don't need it as it isn't 
> really useful at the moment.
> There's a DIP to fix it and make it more powerful though:
>
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/97
>
> And if you are looking for @read, @write limitations the 
> accessors library might be interesting to you:
>
> https://code.dlang.org/packages/accessors

Nice read, and the library seems interesting 👍