The case of -debug -O and: is breaking pure/@nogc/nothrow/@safe UB under -debug?
Guillaume Piolat
first.last at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 13:15:08 UTC 2018
The D specification says:
"A ConditionalStatement that has a DebugCondition is called a
DebugStatement. DebugStatements have relaxed semantic checks in
that pure, @nogc, nothrow and @safe checks are not done. Neither
do DebugStatements influence the inference of pure, @nogc,
nothrow and @safe attributes."
So it seems under a debug clause you don't have to conform to
pure/@nogc/nothrow/@safe.
The immediate question that follow is:
"Is breaking pure/@nogc/nothrow/@safe Undefined Behaviour (UB) in
a DebugStatement?"
Would the optimizer -O breaks code that breaks such by virtue of
being -debug?
If no (not UB), doesn't this guarantees that no optimizations
will ever be performed thanks to pure/@nogc/nothrow/@safe?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list