typeof function literals which define the types of its parameters but do not give their parameters names

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Thursday, 27 December 2018 at 08:53:30 UTC, Johannes Loher 
wrote:
> If this behavior is indeed intentional, it should at least be 
> covered in the spec.

I know the template part is intentional (including the identifier 
thing, function names are allowed to share names with global 
identifiers and override them locally), though indeed, it giving 
void I think is a bug. Just in that category where nobody cares 
enough to put a lot of effort into it.