Could that bug be catch using D's way?

[Basile B.]

On Monday, 19 February 2018 at 21:34:04 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
> On Monday, 19 February 2018 at 14:20:16 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> I had never used Checked and i discover that strangely there's 
>> no hook for opAssign. onLowerBound and onUpperBound works for 
>> +=, -=, *=, /=, %=, ^^=, &=, |=, ^=, <<=, >>=, and >>>=. But 
>> since init is 0, += works:
>
> Ah, thanks. Filed a bug:
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18471
>
> --
>   Simen

I think this is a design choice, it's too obvious to be an 
omission (it's even documented that opAssign is like the ctor).

I'm curious to know what's the rationale though.