issue with each specifically for x86
ketmar
ketmar at ketmar.no-ip.org
Wed Mar 7 21:39:58 UTC 2018
Matt Gamble wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 21:02:30 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
>> On 03/07/2018 09:09 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
>>> ----
>>> double f() { return 1; }
>>> void main()
>>> {
>>> cast(void) f();
>>> cast(void) f();
>>> cast(void) f();
>>> cast(void) f();
>>> cast(void) f();
>>> cast(void) f();
>>> cast(void) f();
>>> double b = 2;
>>> assert(b == 2); /* fails; should pass */
>>> }
>>> ----
>>
>> With `real` instead of `double` x86_64 is also affected.
>
> Wow. Good to know I'm not crazy. I was afk for a bit, sorry. I guess I'm
> glad I found it and posted. The conversation has gone beyond my realm of
> understanding. Has anyone tested on 2.079 like Ali wanted. I have not had
> a chance to install. I was going to wait to post the bug till that was
> tried.
sure, it is still there in git HEAD. it is not the bug that can be fixed
"accidentally". %-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list