OK, I'm stumped on this one: dstep, struct, mixin, bitfields

[Russel Winder]

On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 22:18 +0100, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 2018-03-21 20:30, Russel Winder wrote:
> 
> > Thanks to Adam and Ali, it was clear and obvious.
> 
> Please report and issue so it's not forgotten.

I am guessing you mean against DStep rather than D :-)

Though clearly T and I would prefer version not to be a D keyword.

I suspect I have seen one place where DStep has turned version into version_
where version was a variable name. In this case "version" was a string used to
create a bitfield using a mixin(bitfield!(…)) construct. Is that likely easy
to fix?  

-- 
Russel.
==========================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-learn/attachments/20180322/74541362/attachment.sig>