"in" no longer "scope" since 2.079.0?

[Kagamin]

On Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 09:58:11 UTC, bauss wrote:
> So now "in" is basically just an alias and serves no real 
> purpose or is there a plan to eventually make "in" mean 
> something other than just "const"?

At this point it's the spec that serves no real purpose, 
sometimes in is scope, sometimes it isn't and sometimes scope is 
not scope either. I don't think any decision was made on this, 
it's just PRs getting merged as long as tests pass.