Ambiguous template parameter names
jmh530
john.michael.hall at gmail.com
Thu May 3 02:48:10 UTC 2018
On Thursday, 3 May 2018 at 00:52:58 UTC, Meta wrote:
> [snip]
>
> It's not a big per se. It's a consequence of the declaration
> expanding to the real template function form (I can't type it
> all out as I'm on my phone), thus the inner `val` from the
> function shadows the one from the template.
That makes sense. Before creating the example, I would have
assumed that when you instantiate it as foo!1, then the `val=1`
would flow through to the inner foo function.
template foo(int val)
{
int foo(int val)
{
return val;
}
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list