is ==
Uknown
sireeshkodali1 at gmail.com
Fri May 18 23:58:18 UTC 2018
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 23:53:12 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
> Why does D complain when using == to compare with null? Is
> there really any technical reason? if one just defines == null
> to is null then there should be no problem. It seems like a
> pedantic move by who ever implemented it and I'm hoping there
> is actually a good technical reason for it.
D only complains of this when you use ref types (classes or AAs).
For e.g:
--- test.d
void main()
{
int * p;
assert (p == null && p is null);
class C
{
int x;
}
C c;
assert (c is null);
assert (c == null); //error, c is a reference, so there is
confusion between opEquals and null check
}
---
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list