Is HibernateD dead?

Matthias Klumpp matthias at
Wed May 23 16:21:17 UTC 2018

On Monday, 7 May 2018 at 18:10:14 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> On Saturday, 5 May 2018 at 09:32:32 UTC, Brian wrote:
>> On Thursday, 3 May 2018 at 10:27:47 UTC, Pasqui23 wrote:
>>> Last commit on
>>> was almost a year ago
>>> So what is the status of HibernateD?Should I use it if I need 
>>> an ORM? Or would I risk unpatched security risks?
>> You can use Entity & Database library:
> I've tried both a while back, and they are still inferior to 
> Hibernated (no surprise there, both projects are very new). 
> [...]

I've looked at this again today, end Entity now seems to have 
OneToMany/ManyToMany relations (for 18 days), which is great news!
I might need to play with this a little again. In any case, if I 
do port my D code to another ORM, I want the next port to be the 
last time I ever do that, because it's a lot of work with quite 
some risk of breakage.

It's also really sad that the existing ORMs don't share a common 
database abstraction library, but well, different people do 
things differently.

In any case, many thanks to Vadim Lopatin for merging the 
existing PRs into ddbc and Hibernated for now! That makes life 
easier already :-)

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list