version(StdDoc)

[Neia Neutuladh]

On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 21:43:01 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> A solution like that might work reasonably well, but you still
> have the problem of what to do when a symbol is documented in multiple
> version blocks, and having almost all the documentation in one version
> block and a few pieces of it in other version blocks would risk getting
> confusing and messy.

Keeping symbol names and function arguments consistent between them is 
also an issue; it's not just the documentation. The normal solution is to 
put the version blocks inside the relevant symbols -- sometimes type 
aliases inside version blocks and consistent code outside, sometimes 
functions where the entire body is a set of version blocks.