const and immutable values, D vs C++?

Ola Fosheim Grøstad ola.fosheim.grostad at
Thu Dec 5 08:06:07 UTC 2019

I haven't used const much in the past because I got burned on 
transitive const, so I managed to confuse myself.  I am not 
really interested in const/immutabel references here, only 
values. Seems like there is no reason to ever use const values, 
except when the value may contain a pointer to something 

The only difference, as far as I can tell, is if the value type 
has pointers to other objects, immutable requires them to be to 
immutable objects. Which is a bit odd when you think of it. It 
basically means that you cannot put pointers to memory registers 
in ROM in a type safe manner... :-/ . That is a very odd 
restriction, because that is something you might want to do...

Seems to me that immutable should allow pointers to mutable 
memory and that const really shouldn't have been applicable to 
values, but only to pointers.

Anyway seems the rule of thumb would be:

- always use immutable on values
- except when the value might contain a pointer to non-immutable


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list