depreciated function delete

[Ali]

On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 21:37:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On 1/18/19 4:32 PM, Ali wrote:
>> On Friday, 18 January 2019 at 21:13:34 UTC, Steven 
>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> On 1/18/19 3:48 PM, alik wrote:
>>>> Hi there. as you know delete function is depreciated. so I 
>>>> tried to use the __delete function for the code below:
>>>>
>>>> if (this.parse_buffer.length > this.parse_size)
>>>>              {
>>>>                  __delete(this.parse_buffer);
>>>>                  this.parse_buffer.length = this.parse_size;
>>>>              }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> but in return after I compile code I get the error like : 
>>>> Undefined identifier.
>>>> when I use destroy instead I don't get any errors. but I 
>>>> want to use __delete because of the garbage collector as it 
>>>> frees up the memory
>>>>
>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> import core.memory: __delete;
>>>
>> 
>> thank you for your quick answer. I did it for my own files but 
>> should I change something in here :
>> 
>> /root/.dub/packages/undead-1.0.9/undead/src/undead/regexp.d(370,17): Deprecation: The delete keyword has been deprecated.  Use object.destroy() (and core.memory.GC.free() if applicable) instead.
>> 
>
> Yeah that should be updated to use __delete, feel free to 
> submit a PR, or raise an issue.
>
> -Steve

did it but now it shows me another deprecated functions:


  Deprecation: Symbol object.string is not visible from module 
math because it is privately imported in module string

  Deprecation: foreach: loop index implicitly converted from 
size_t to int

/root/.dub/packages/undead-1.0.9/undead/src/undead/socketstream.d(124,32): Deprecation: undead.socketstream.SocketStream.seek cannot be annotated with @disable because it is overriding a function in the base class


instead of @disable I dont have any idea what to use.