low-latency GC

[Ola Fosheim Grostad]

On Sunday, 6 December 2020 at 05:41:05 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
> OK.  Some rationale?  Do you, for example, believe that 
> no-probable-dlanger could benefit from a low-latency GC?  That 
> it is too hard to implement?  That the language is somehow 
> incompatible? That ...

The GC needs to scan all the affected call stacks before it can 
do incremental collection. Multi threaded GC is generally not 
compatible with low level programming.