about const ref

[Ferhat Kurtulmuş]

On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 at 09:20:11 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 at 07:51:04 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş 
> wrote:

> You're correct for 'a' and 'b'. However `in` only entails 
> `const`, so it is not an exact replacement.
> Additionally, you might want to add `scope` to show that the 
> parameter does not escape.
>
> Note that a big limitation on `const ref` parameters at the 
> moment is that it does not accept literals, which is something 
> Andrei talked about a few years ago at DConf (or was it last 
> year?).

Thank you for clarification.