Alternative to std.range.choose

[James Gray]

On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 06:16:44 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 04:33:20 UTC, James Gray wrote:
>> [...]
>
> it seems `choose` evaluates both arguments instead of using 
> lazy evaluation. IMO this is a broken API to me but it has been 
> like this for longer so this would be difficult to change. 
> Additionally with regards to storing in memory this is another 
> problem.
>
> [...]

Thank you very much.