DMD 2.092 and DIP 25

[Mike Parker]

On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 16:14:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:

>
> This is not about const or not, it's about lifetime management.
>
> For example, this would return a pointer to a stack frame that 
> is about to go away:
>
> const(char)* foo()
> {
>    ErrorInfo info;
>    return info.message;
> }
>
> I know that you have already fixed the problem, but I wanted to 
> make sure you understood why the compiler is complaining.

Yes, that was me having never actually read DIP 25 and 
misunderstanding what it was about. I've since been educated. 
Thanks!