Template pattern delegate?
frame
frame86 at live.com
Mon Oct 26 00:56:26 UTC 2020
On Sunday, 25 October 2020 at 12:02:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 10/25/20 4:30 AM, frame wrote:
>> Is there a possibility to write templated code / custom trait
>> pattern with usage like a delegate?
>>
>> I have a try-catch block with different types and don't want
>> to repeat myself in every method again. It's always the same,
>> just what's tried changes, eg.:
>>
>> pseudo code:
>>
>> template myStuff(mixin code)
>> {
>> try {
>> code();
>> }
>> catch (X e) {
>> ...
>> }
>> catch (Y e) {
>> ...
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> static myStuff!({
>> writeln("...");
>> });
>>
>
> That's one of my DConf Onlide slides but for a limited use
> case! :)
>
> int tried(Func, string functionName = __FUNCTION__, string file
> = __FILE__, size_t line = __LINE__)(Func func) {
> static if (!is (ReturnType!Func == int)) {
> pragma(msg, format!"\n%s(%s): Error: %s must return int
> error code"(file, line, functionName));
> static assert(false);
> }
>
> void printError(T)(T err) {
> stderr.writefln!"\n%s(%s): Failed to execute %s: %s"(file,
> line, functionName, err);
> }
>
> try {
> return func();
>
> } catch (Exception exc) {
> printError(exc.msg);
> return 1;
>
> } catch (Error err) {
> printError(err);
> import core.stdc.stdlib : abort;
> abort();
> }
>
> assert(false);
> }
>
> Then, all extern(C) functions would be written the same way:
>
> extern(C) int foo() {
> return tried({
> // ...
> return 0;
> });
> }
>
> Ali
I see that your approach can handle functions and delegates but
isn't that not equivalent like this template for a function?
auto myStuff(T)(T function() fn) {
try {
return fn();
}
catch (Exception e) {
//
}
}
I wonder if I could use such a template as static variant and the
compiler just expands the code? Just thinking that using a
function or delegate is an overhead. Maybe not a function but a
delegate will allocate GC memory I think.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list