"this" as default parameter for a constructor.
Mathias LANG
geod24 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 14 04:25:24 UTC 2021
On Sunday, 11 April 2021 at 20:38:10 UTC, Pierre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a class with a reference to the parent object and a
> constructor that has the parent as parameter
>
> class foo {
> this ( foo p /* , other params */ ) {
> parent = p;
> }
>
> foo parent;
> }
>
> Of cause, the parent is almost always the object that creates
> the new intance. So
>
> auto f = new foo(this);
>
> I'd like to set "this" ( the creator ) as default argument if
> the constructor :
>
> this ( foo p = this ) {...}
>
> I can't. But however, the function, the argument and the
> current object in body of the constructor are 3 different
> things and the compiler can distinguish each one.
>
> Is there a way to pass the reference of the caller to the
> creator as default argument ?
Depending on what you are trying to do, I would recommend to
instead go with nested classes if you can. E.g.
```D
class MyClass {
class MyChild {
this (int value) { this.value = value; }
private int value;
}
}
void main ()
{
auto mc = new MyClass;
auto child = mc.new MyChild(42);
}
```
It'll give you an automatic reference to the parent. Of course if
you are trying to do something like linked list, where all
elements have the same type, it won't work.
In this case, the `create` approach might be better. You should
be able to cook something with a template `this` parameter to
reduce boilerplate.
And regarding allowing `this` as default argument: Definitely no.
While it could be possible with some stretch (e.g. we'll have to
delay default parameter semantic to the call site, unlike what is
currently done, and that would mess with things like overload
resolutions and template type inference), it wouldn't be sound /
it'd be very surprising. I for one would expect `this` to be the
object referencing itself, not the `this` of my caller.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list