Breaking ";" rule with lambda functions

[pascal111]

On Monday, 1 August 2022 at 16:00:50 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
> On Monday, 1 August 2022 at 15:52:34 UTC, pascal111 wrote:
>> But how can we accept that both are functions and expressions 
>> at the same time and we know that expressions can be used to 
>> build functions themselves?!! I think they are not the same.
>
> This is getting ridiculous. I'm out.

I'm not reading your mind, and you are not reading my mind and 
expecting wrongly what I think in. We are discussing an important 
point here. The question is simple "why there's no ";" in lambda 
functions syntax?!!"