In-place extension of arrays only for certain alignment?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On 8/17/22 10:09 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>  > IIRC, your data does not need to be sequential in *physical memory*,
>  > which means you can use a ring buffer that is segmented instead of
>  > virtually mapped, and that can be of any size.
> 
> I thought about that as well. But I would like the sizes of blocks 
> (Appenders?) be equal in size so that opIndex still can provide O(1) 
> guarantee. (Compute the block + an offset.)

It's still O(1). You only have 2 slices to worry about.

Perhaps next beerconf we can discuss!

-Steve