How to workaround on this (bug?)
frame
frame86 at live.com
Sat Sep 17 00:19:16 UTC 2022
On Friday, 16 September 2022 at 23:06:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Basically, if you pass something to .fun by value, then that
> value must be destroyed by .fun once it's ready to return. So
> if the value has a dtor, the dtor must be called upon exiting
> from .fun. Since Variant has a throwing dtor, this means .fun
> may throw when it's about to return, which violates `nothrow`.
I understand why this happens but not why the compiler does not
check if the value is actually destroyed in user code by
`.destroy()`.
Thanks for your suggestion, I will consider this.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list