Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

thebluepandabear thereabluepandabear at
Wed Feb 15 20:34:13 UTC 2023

On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 20:06:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 07:13:41 UTC, 
> thebluepandabear wrote:
>>> Time to move on to OCaml programmers telling us D doesn't 
>>> have floating point arithmetic because there's no `+.` 
>>> operator.
>> that's not the same thing though, you've created a great false 
>> equivalence! Congrats.
> Only if you don't understand D's encapsulation. You're going on 
> at length (apparently under multiple names in this thread) 
> because you don't like D's implementation of encapsulation. 
> That's no different from complaining that the `+` operator 
> should be `+.`, and until D makes the change, it doesn't 
> support floating point addition.
> There are reasonable arguments for changing and not changing 
> D's implementation of encapsulation. Your claim that D doesn't 
> support encapsulation is false.

'under multiple names'... You can clearly see I have the same 
name, simply different profile pictures.

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list