Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

Adam D Ruppe destructionator at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 00:27:29 UTC 2023

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 00:21:12 UTC, thebluepandabear 
wrote:
> there's nothing in the language currently that would 'force' 
> the user

Why do you hate freedom?

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list