Is comparison of shared data thread-safe?
bauss
jacobbauss at gmail.com
Fri Mar 17 12:47:03 UTC 2023
On Thursday, 16 March 2023 at 12:32:34 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> With -preview=nosharedaccess, I get:
>
> int y = 2;
> shared int x = y; // OK
>
> assert(x == 2); // no error
> y = x; // error
>
> So for the assignment to y, reading x is an error and
> atomicLoad should be used instead. But is it an oversight that
> reading x in the assert is not an error?
>
> I have also found this in a unittest in core.atomic:
>
> shared(size_t) i;
>
> atomicOp!"+="(i, cast(size_t) 1);
> assert(i == 1);
>
> Is the assert somehow thread-safe?
I think it __should__ be fine since `i` cannot be in a state
where it gets modified and read at the same time.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list