Array concatenation & optimisation
Nick Treleaven
nick at geany.org
Sun Jul 21 11:07:13 UTC 2024
On Sunday, 21 July 2024 at 10:33:38 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>> For instance, will this example *always* allocate a new
>> dynamic array for the array literal, and then append it to the
>> existing one, even in optimised builds?
>> ```d
>> void append(ref int[] a){
>> a ~= [5, 4, 9];
>> }
>> ```
>
> If there is enough spare capacity in a's allocation, no
> allocation will occur.
Sorry, I see what you mean. I've compared the -vasm output
(without -O) for that function and this one:
```d
void append(ref int[] a){
enum e = [5, 4, 9];
a ~= e;
}
```
The ASM output is the same. If you use runtime value elements I'm
not sure but I think there's still no heap allocation.
I'm not good at reading ASM though.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list