alternative linters

[Basile B.]

On Tuesday, 16 December 2025 at 16:24:04 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 December 2025 at 15:05:54 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>>
>>> Im not sure if I need a good linter, and i'm quite sure I 
>>> wouldn't agree with people who like linters on whats good.
>>
>> I think D should do what I'made for STYX, [a It's really a 
>> leaf feature,
>>
>> Things like "unused import checks" are not possible.
>
> I think your getting even futher away from understanding 
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/crazymonkyyy/lintyyy/refs/heads/master/SPEC.md
>
> Im quite unsure what your ai usage theory is here, but they are 
> reading and writing code syntaxically not semantically, and 
> despite this I dont see many "semantic" errors, is all logical 
> errors.

The idea, to rephrase a bit, is the cross relations between 
modules, the "xrefs", let's say. It will be very hard to 
understand, for an AI, to get eponymous template instances.

All the information are there, right before the middle-end pass, 
just plug a few linters "sub-programs" right there.