How to construct a struct that does not explicitly define a constructor

[user1234]

On Saturday, 1 March 2025 at 02:19:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
>
> Thanks, I forgot about that syntax. Another question I have is 
> if there's a way to do this inline:
>
> ```d
> struct Test
> {
>     int n;
>     float f;
>
>     static Test opCall(int n, float f)
>     {
>         //return {n, f};            Error
>         //return Test {n, f};       Error
>         //return {n: n, f: f};      Error
>         //return Test {n: n, f: f}; Error
>     }
> }
>
> void main()
> {
>     auto test = Test(1, 2.0);
>     assert(test.n == 1);
>     assert(test.f == 2.0);
> }
> ```

As you've been said, that does not work ATM but that is something 
that I expect to work from day one when D will have tuples

```d
struct Test
{
     int n;
     double f;
     static Test opCall(int n, float f)
     {
         return (0,0.1);
     }
}
```

because the tuple-expression `(0,0.1)` is explicitly convertible 
to `Test`, based on the concept of "structural typing".