Subclass TcpSocket?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Tuesday, 18 March 2025 at 07:42:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> The base class constructors are not nothrow, so WrappedTCP's 
> constructor cannot be nothrow. There really isn't a way out of 
> that, because if a constructor throws, the object's state is 
> destroyed. So, catching and handling the Exception to make your 
> function nothrow isn't really an option like it would be with 
> many functions.

FWIW, this does compile:

```d
class A
{
     this() {}
}

class B : A
{
     this() nothrow {
         try {
             super();
         } catch(Exception e) {}
     }
}
```
Not sure if it should...

-Steve