"Concepts" should not be part of function headers

[jmh530]

On Thursday, 23 October 2025 at 02:06:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> [snip]
>
> So the problem wasn't solved, just moved from the public API to 
> the internal API.  Since it's no longer user-facing, those 
> overloads really should be separately-named functions instead 
> IMNSHO. Not 50 overloads on `toImpl`.
>
>
> T

What's the advantage of making them separately-named functions?