Microsoft chose Go instead of C# or Rust to rewrite TypeScript

Serg Gini kornburn at yandex.ru
Mon Sep 8 16:51:09 UTC 2025


On Monday, 8 September 2025 at 16:43:10 UTC, Neto wrote:
> this is the reasoning
>
> https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-go/discussions/411
>
> I wonder if they did consider D language. First comment says 
> why Rust would be a good choice "If not C#, I would have 
> expected Rust, since that's where the rest of the ecosystem is. 
> So, another surprise there." it seems D is missing ecosystem to 
> be competive language?

It is an old news now.
They decided to use Go, because it was closer to the language of 
their initial implementation (TypeScript).

D is expensive for production in most of the cases.
In wider terms I would say it is not production ready.
{
Yes, I know there are companies that are using it in production.
Even several big ones like Weka and Symmetry.

No, it's not enough.
}

So I don't think they were considering D at all. Most probably 
they had some short-list of the language that their team knows 
and that are suitable for the task.

Something like C#, Rust, Go, C++

And not sure if ecosystem was a significant weight in the 
decision.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list