not operator operator..

[Charles]

 > D !is BASIC

Hehe.

I personally prefer the !is syntax .



kris wrote:
> S. Chancellor wrote:
> 
>> I really really hate the !in, !is syntax.   I think a lot of other 
>> people do too. I propose that the word not, become an operator on 
>> operators.  For example:
>>
>> Foo not is null
>> Foo not in Bar
>>
>> This not keyword will only function when it is part of these expressions:
>>
>> EqualExpression
>> RelExpression
>> InExpression
>>
>> As a consequence the following would be valid:
>>
>> Foo not == Bar
>> Foo not <= Bar
> 
> 
> 
> D !is BASIC
> 
> ;-)