Lazy eval -- an example issue

[Paolo Invernizzi]

kris wrote:

>> On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:33:08 -0700, Paolo Invernizzi  
>> <arathorn at NOSPAM_fastwebnet.it> wrote:
>> can you post us the performance difference 
>> you  have noticed using the char[] version versus the delegate version?
> 
> As for performance differences, I suspect you're missing the bigger 
> picture, Paolo?

I've followed the discussion.

While I agree that ambiguities must be avoided if possible, and that 
compiler-made decision are sometimes frustrating (but we all are happy 
about class-all-virtual-methods!), I was just curious of the performance 
impact of such a change...

---
Paolo Invernizzi