Performance of method calls

[Mike Capp]

== Quote from Daniel Keep (daniel.keep+lists at gmail.com)'s article

> The only thing I really miss when using structures are constructors and
> destructors.  Any reason why we can't have them, Walter?  Pwetty pweese?

I think most people use static opCall as a workaround for the lack of struct
ctors. It's not a perfect substitute (in particular, you don't get invariant
checks on 'construction') but it's liveable.

I doubt very much whether Walter will ever add struct dtors - it requires a bunch
of extra code to be generated, and with "scope" there's no great need for them.

cheers
Mike