a case where static foreach dosn't work "correctly"
Alexander Panek
a.panek at brainsware.org
Wed Dec 6 22:45:50 PST 2006
Have you tried to do the same with DMD 0.176 ?
Maybe the bug is already solved in one of the two big massacres!
BCS wrote:
> If a static foreach is given a tuple of const ints, the ints don't
> behave like consts inside of the foreach body. I havent checked other
> cases but you can't use them for array indexes in ASM operations:
>
>
> voif fn(V...)()
> {
> const int i = 0
> int[3] array;
>
> foreach(j, V)
> {
> asm
> {
> mov EAX, array[i]; // works
> mov EAX, array[j]; // fails
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> Why does this matter you ask? It would allow this to work:
>
>
> /***** unsigned big int with "size" words of precision */
>
> template BigNum(uint size)
> {
> static if(size == 0)
> static assert(false, "BigNum!(1) is not valid");
> else static if(size == 1)
> static assert(false, "BigNum!(1) is not implemented");
> else static if(size == 2)
> alias use!(1, 1) start;
> else
> alias build!(size, size-2, size-1) start;
> }
>
> template build(uint size, uint i, V...)
> {
> static if(i==1)
> alias use!(size, 1, V) build;
> else
> alias build!(size, i-1, i, V) build;
> }
>
> template use(uint size, V...)
> {
> struct use
> {
> uint[size] valuse;
> use!(size, V).use opAdd(use!(size, V).use to)
> {
> uint[size] mine, other;
> mine[] = valuse;
> other[] = to.valuse[];
> asm
> {
> mov EAX, mine[0];
> add other[0], EAX;
> }
> foreach(i; V)
> {
> asm
> {
> mov EAX, mine[i]; // this fails
> adc other[i], EAX;
> }
> }
> use!(size, V).use ret;
> ret.valuse[] = other;
> return ret;
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> DMD 0.174
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list