Allow implicit template properties for templates with more than one member

[Daniel Keep]

Frits van Bommel wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> 
>> You can do this:
>>
>> template Foo()
>> {
>>     const uint Foo = 5;
>> }
>>
>> ...
>>
>> uint x = Foo!();
>>
>> And it automatically looks up Foo!().Foo because it has one member 
>> named the same as the template.
>>
>> What I'm suggesting is that the "have one member" part be changed.  
>> I've written and seen a lot of template code that does stuff like this:
> 
> 
> This has been proposed before, but (IIRC) with the added qualification 
> that all other members should be private for it to work. Still hasn't 
> happened though :(.

Mmm; I agree with the extra restriction: the implicit property works iff 
the template has exactly one public member with the same name as the 
template itself.

	-- Daniel