If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?

[leoandru]

In article <e8mgl5$1jnn$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, Tom S says...
>
>Walter Bright wrote:
>> Sean Kelly wrote:
>>> About the only remaining issue for me is whether any other template 
>>> features might be added, specifically:
>>>
>>> * whether the template specialization mechanism will be extended to 
>>> support type lists or 'is' expression logic
>> 
>> Not for 1.0.
>> 
>>> * whether D will gain a structured way to identify or specialize for 
>>> static arrays (currently, specializing for T[] seems potentially not 
>>> useful)
>> 
>> Not for 1.0.
>
>Oo.. k... how about:
>
>* template function overloading
>* fixes for mixin visibility rules
>
>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/38389.html
>http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/39130
>http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D/39320
>
>?
>
>
>-- 
>Tomasz Stachowiak  /+ a.k.a. h3r3tic +/

Yup. this was something I tried to do recently. It would be a real nice
addition.
http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D.learn/3819