Import concerns revisited

[Johan Granberg]

Walter Bright wrote:
> But is it going to be done a lot? 

assuming we get static import i think this will get done a lot
static import foo.bar.m;
alias foo.bar.m m;

which I would prefere to write as
import foo.bar.m as m;

I think the among the C++ crowd the people who refuse to use using 
namespace would use the more qualified form and thous who use using 
wont. As I think D will attract many C++ programmers and for and against 
using is an argument i here a lot (many on the different sides where i 
come from) i think the D language will appeal more to C++ programmers if 
as is introduced as it look cleaner and the more programmer a language 
can appeal to the more it will bee used.