Is D 0.163 D 1.0?

[Walter Bright]

Tony wrote:
> "Walter Bright" <newshound at digitalmars.com> wrote in message 
> news:e9sk71$2u86$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>> I think the title says it all.
> 
> Do you intend to make any further changes that would break existing code?

Not to anything starting with "1.", unless it is to fix a clear 
implementation bug. As D evolves, it's certainly possible that "2." may 
break existing code in small ways, as other languages do.

What I expect is that the "1.xx" series will focus on stability and bug 
fixes, while "2.xx" will be looking forward to being a significant 
upgrade in features.