Is D 0.163 D 1.0?

[Brad Roberts]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Brad Roberts wrote:
>> I suggest that discussions for specific bugs and why they should or 
>> should not be blockers for 1.0 be taken to the .bugs newsgroup and not 
>> be part of this thread.
> 
> It's really hard to say when a compiler is debugged or not. DMC++ has 
> been around for 23 years and bugs still crop up in it.
> 
> Declaring the compiler "1.0" won't impede the regular flow of bug fixes 
> and updates, what it does is say the feature set is 1.0 and the compiler 
> is usable.

Agreed.. 1.0-ness is most about feature stability, but not exclusively. 
  That's one reason I suggested to take specific bug aspect out of this 
thread and over to .bugs.  Let this one stay more feature focused.

Later,
Brad